“National insurance cut raises questions over state pension funding”

Jan 15, 2024 | Pensions

An independent (financial adviser’s) view

In an election year, all parties will try to be all things to all men. Mostly, it’s only stuff which matters ‘on the doorstep’ which matters. In isolation, Mrs Miggins (not my invention) will be delighted that her pension has gone up with the highest measure of inflation; and no one running a business will be complaining that National Insurance has been reduced. And the two are no longer directly connected, as, although you need to ‘pay your stamp’ for the right number of years to get your state pension, it’s not actually paid for from a separate, stamp-related pot. But you can bet that if someone in some future government decides that the inflation-linking can be cut, it will be National Insurance which will be blamed.  And cut it will be, I’m afraid, in the not-too distant, post-election, future.

Read more here

“Tariffs through time: have they ever worked?”

“Tariffs through time: have they ever worked?”

History may not repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes. Is what Trump is doing as ‘unprecedented’ as every headline proclaims? I’m sure other wiser writers have spotted some of these historical echoes, but let’s remember some headlines from US history.

“Stocks surge and yields stabilise as Trump tariffs paused”

“Stocks surge and yields stabilise as Trump tariffs paused”

“The reason our stock market is so successful is because of me. I’ve always been great with money, I’ve always been great with jobs, that’s what I do”, said the man himself about (of course) himself. And, yes, one tweet, if we’re still allowed to use that old Woke term, on Truth Social can indeed send markets firmly up as well as down.